In each section we were given feedback as shown below by picking out 5 random examples:
The overall scores that we received from our feedback all of which was 30+ which is high level 3 and level 4. Below is overall scores:
30 marks - 1 person gave us this score
31 marks - 1 person gave us this score
34 marks - 4 people gave us this score
35 marks - 2 people gave us this score
37 marks - 2 people gave us this score
38 marks - 3 people gave us this score
39 marks - 1 person gave us this score
From these overall scores it shows us that the majority of our fellow peers who watched our latest music video draft felt as though we were a strong level 4. This shows us that our music video was liked by a wide range of people.
We were given a set of positive feedback which was said by more than one person:
- Close ups of Connor work very well and shots link well with the speed of the video itself.
- Good use of the different variety of shots
- Good appropriate locations and costumes
- Performance is very good
- Good transitions and different techniques keep your entertained in the video
Negative feedback on the music video:
- The scene next to the card does not work, the cloth on Connors head was not a good choice of clothing
- Less shots inside the room
- Less shots inside the dome
- Some lip syncing could be adjusted towards the end of the video
- Shots inside different rooms are of poorer quality, cereal killer cafe
- The gin doesn't work
From this wide range of feedback, we noticed that there was constraining views between different sets of people. For example the Bombay sapphire was judged however we have recently stated as to why we have the gin in the music video. However after looking at this feedback we know that maybe we need to change the quality of the image inside cereal killer cafe at which after looking at it again it is significantly weaker than our other footage.